Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDIvsMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I

2.0 TDI

177 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Skyactiv-X

180 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    205 km/h
    127 mph
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    44/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Lightest
    1,538 kg
    3,391 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    117 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
177hp132kW
180hp134kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
224Nm165lb-ft
Curb weight
1,707kg3,763lb
1,538kg3,391lb
Gross weight-
2,042kg4,502lb
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
89.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
81.1s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
68.9s
Calculated
67.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
104hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
146Nm/t97lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
980km609mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,697mm185in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,882mm74in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,660mm65in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
193mm8in
175mm7in
Trunk volume-
430L
Max trunk volume-
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
48L
CO2 emissions-
111g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDIMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XPowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X6,000 rpm3,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
68.9 s
67.6 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
177 hp
132 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X has 3 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
224 Nm
165 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
1,707 kg
3,763 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
1,538 kg
3,391 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
205 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI8.6 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X8.9 s

Although Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X has more power, Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
104 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
177 hp
132 kW
8.6 s
205 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW
8.9 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDIMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
177 hp
132 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
224 Nm
165 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.9 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,707 kg
3,763 lb
1,538 kg
3,391 lb
Fuel consumption
-
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
-
980 km
609 mi
CO2 score
-
111 g/km
Trunk score
-
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
104 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI

  • Has 156 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Is 169 kg lighter
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X - car comparison - FastVsFaster