Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIvsSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi

RS 2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2013-2017
VS

Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2011-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    242 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    220 hp
    164 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,387 kg
    3,058 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    159 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    149 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    610 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSISeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
220hp164kW
211hp157kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,387kg3,058lb
1,490kg3,285lb
Gross weight
1,953kg4,306lb
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
To 99% top speed
68.7s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
71.5s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
24.8s
Calculated
26.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton
Calculated
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
781km485mi
Calculated
1,000km621mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,685mm184in
4,666mm184in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,772mm70in
Height
1,452mm57in
1,454mm57in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,642mm104in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,522mm60in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,523mm60in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
-
Trunk volume
610L
422L
Max trunk volume
1,740L
1,354L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
70L
CO2 emissions
149g/km
162g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSISeat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI4,600-6,000 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSISeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.8 s
26.5 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
100 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI has 9 hp more than Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
1,387 kg
3,058 lb
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,490 kg
3,285 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
242 km/h
150 mph
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
239 km/h
149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI7.1 s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI7.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
781 km
485 mi
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,000 km
621 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
7.1 s
242 km/h
150 mph
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.3 s
239 km/h
149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.1 s
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSISeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
211 hp
157 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.3 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
Lightness
1,387 kg
3,058 lb
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,666 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Range score
781 km
485 mi
1,000 km
621 mi
CO2 score
149 g/km
162 g/km
Trunk score
610 L
21.5 cu ft
422 L
14.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSISeat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 103 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 188 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 13 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Has 219 km (136 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TSI
JCW 2.0
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsMiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
2.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI vs Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster