Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi

RS 2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2013-2017
VS

Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8)

2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    242 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    220 hp
    164 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,387 kg
    3,058 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    159 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
Power
220hp164kW
220hp164kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,387kg3,058lb
1,602kg3,532lb
Gross weight
1,953kg4,306lb
2,270kg5,004lb
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
68.7s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
61.6s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
24.8s
Calculated
25.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton
Calculated
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
781km485mi
Calculated
957km594mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,685mm184in
4,777mm188in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,832mm72in
Height
1,452mm57in
1,506mm59in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,789mm110in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,586mm62in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,569mm62in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
174mm7in
Trunk volume
610L
639L
Max trunk volume
1,740L
1,769L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
66L
CO2 emissions
149g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI4,420-6,250 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.8 s
25.7 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
100 mph
161 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
1,387 kg
3,058 lb
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
1,602 kg
3,532 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
242 km/h
150 mph
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI7.1 s
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI6.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
781 km
485 mi
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
957 km
594 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
7.1 s
242 km/h
150 mph
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
6.8 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
639 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,777 mm
188.1 in
Height
1,506 mm
59.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.1 s
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
220 hp
164 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
6.8 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,387 kg
3,058 lb
1,602 kg
3,532 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
639 L
22.6 cu ft
Length
4,777 mm
188.1 in
Height
1,506 mm
59.3 in
Range score
781 km
485 mi
957 km
594 mi
CO2 score
149 g/km
-
Trunk score
610 L
21.5 cu ft
639 L
22.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI

  • Is 215 kg lighter
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI

  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 175 km (109 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 29 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TSI
JCW 2.0
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsMiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B9)2.0 TSI
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0d
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.0 TSI
3.2 i V6 24V FSI 4WD
VS
VolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B6)3.2 i V6 24V FSI 4WD
RS 2.0 TSI
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsRenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Passat Alltrack (B8) 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster