Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIvsMini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi

RS 2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2013-2017
VS

Mini Clubman (F54)

JCW 2.0

231 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    242 km/h
    150 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,387 kg
    3,058 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    159 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    149 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    781 km
    485 mi
  • Largest trunk
    610 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIMiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
Power
220hp164kW
231hp172kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,387kg3,058lb
1,475kg3,252lb
Gross weight
1,953kg4,306lb
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
238 km/h
148 mph
To 99% top speed
68.7s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
62.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
6.3s
0-200 km/h
24.8s
Calculated
23.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
14.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton
Calculated
237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
781km485mi
Calculated
649km403mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,685mm184in
4,253mm167in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,452mm57in
1,441mm57in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,553mm61in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,555mm61in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
141mm6in
Trunk volume
610L
360L
Max trunk volume
1,740L
1,250L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
48L
CO2 emissions
149g/km
168g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIMini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0PowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.05,000-6,000 rpm1,450-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIMiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
6.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.8 s
23.2 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
238 km/h
148 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
14.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
100 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
231 hp
172 kW

Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0 has 11 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
1,387 kg
3,058 lb
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
1,475 kg
3,252 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
242 km/h
150 mph
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
238 km/h
148 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI7.1 s
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.06.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
781 km
485 mi
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
649 km
403 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
7.1 s
242 km/h
150 mph
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
231 hp
172 kW
6.3 s
238 km/h
148 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
238 km/h
148 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.1 s
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIMiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
Power
220 hp
164 kW
231 hp
172 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
6.3 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
238 km/h
148 mph
Lightness
1,387 kg
3,058 lb
1,475 kg
3,252 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
Range score
781 km
485 mi
649 km
403 mi
CO2 score
149 g/km
168 g/km
Trunk score
610 L
21.5 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIMini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km12.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi20.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year1,943 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI

  • Is 88 kg lighter
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 133 km (82 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 250 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 19 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
JCW 2.0
JCW 1.6
VS
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0vsMiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI
JCW 2.0
2.0 BiTDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0vsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
RS 2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI
JCW 2.0
2.0d
VS
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
RS 2.0 TSI
JCW 2.0
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsMiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
JCW 2.0
525d
VS
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0vsBMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d
JCW 2.0
2.0 T5
VS
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0vsVolvoV902.0 T5
RS 2.0 TSI
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsRenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe
JCW 2.0
45 TDI V6
VS
MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0vsAUDIA6 Avant (C8)45 TDI V6
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI vs Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster