Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIvsVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi

RS 2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2013-2017
VS

Volvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013

2.4 D5

215 hp2400 ccDieselAWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2013-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    242 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    220 hp
    164 kW
  • Lightest
    1,387 kg
    3,058 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    159 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    610 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5

  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    139 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,321 km
    821 mi
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Power
220hp164kW
215hp160kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
1,387kg3,058lb
1,919kg4,231lb
Gross weight
1,953kg4,306lb
2,390kg5,269lb
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
68.7s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
80.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
24.8s
Calculated
38.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton
Calculated
219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
781km485mi
Calculated
1,321km821mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
2,400cc146cu in
Length
4,685mm184in
4,838mm190in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,870mm74in
Height
1,452mm57in
1,604mm63in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,815mm111in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,614mm64in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,580mm62in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
-
Trunk volume
610L
575L
Max trunk volume
1,740L
1,600L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
70L
CO2 emissions
149g/km
139g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIVolvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5PowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D54,000 rpm1,500-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.8 s
38.1 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
100 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
215 hp
160 kW

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI has 5 hp more than Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
1,387 kg
3,058 lb
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
1,919 kg
4,231 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
242 km/h
150 mph
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI7.1 s
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D58.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
781 km
485 mi
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
1,321 km
821 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
7.1 s
242 km/h
150 mph
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
215 hp
160 kW
8.0 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Power
215 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,838 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,604 mm
63.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Power
215 hp
160 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.1 s
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
Power
220 hp
164 kW
215 hp
160 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
8.0 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,387 kg
3,058 lb
1,919 kg
4,231 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,838 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,604 mm
63.1 in
Range score
781 km
485 mi
1,321 km
821 mi
CO2 score
149 g/km
139 g/km
Trunk score
610 L
21.5 cu ft
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIVolvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km9.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi14.93 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal795 L210 US gal175 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year1,391 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 532 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 35 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5

  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 540 km (335 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 10 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
Volvo XC70 II 2.4 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.4 D5
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5vsVolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5vsVolvoV902.0 T4
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5vsVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
RS 2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI
2.4 D5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5vsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
RS 2.0 TSI
JCW 2.0
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsMiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0d
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.4 D5
CLS 250 BlueTEC
VS
VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5vsMercedes-BenzCLS Shooting Brake (X218)Facelift 2014CLS 250 BlueTEC
RS 2.0 TSI
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSIvsRenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI vs Volvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster