Volvo XC70 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6vsVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful285 hp213 kW
- Lightest1,769 kg3,900 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range1,321 km821 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 285hp213kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,769kg3,900lb | 1,919kg4,231lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 79.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.0s Calculated | 38.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 609km378mi Calculated | 1,321km821mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,953cc180cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,838mm190in | 4,838mm190in |
| Width | 1,861mm73in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,604mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,815mm111in | 2,815mm111in |
| Front track | 1,614mm64in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 210mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 575L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 269g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 5,950 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 6,200 rpm |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.0 s | 38.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 285 hp 213 kW |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 has 70 hp more than Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: 70 hp (52 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 7.6 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 and Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: 6.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 609 km 378 mi |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,321 km 821 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 285 hp 213 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6 | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 285 hp 213 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 609 km 378 mi | 1,321 km 821 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 269 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 | Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
- Has 70 hp more
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 49 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 6.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 712 km (442 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 130 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























