Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III Combi
RS 2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,048 km651 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,387 kg3,058 lb
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,475kg3,252lb | 1,387kg3,058lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 1,953kg4,306lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.2s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 68.7s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.4s Calculated | 24.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,048km651mi Calculated | 781km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,767mm188in | 4,685mm184in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,477mm58in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | 1,740L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 149g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.4 s | 24.8 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 160 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 6.9 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TSI and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 1,048 km 651 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 781 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.9 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.1 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,048 km 651 mi | 781 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 149 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TSI | Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 266 km (166 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
- Is 88 kg lighter
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























