Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0dvsMini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
JCW 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions153 g/km
- Best estimated range1,138 km707 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Lightest1,475 kg3,252 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 1,475kg3,252lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.8s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 62.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.0s Calculated | 23.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,138km707mi Calculated | 649km403mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,955mm195in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,496mm59in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,553mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,555mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,700L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 153g/km | 168g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,450-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.0 s | 23.2 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 100 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW |
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d has 9 hp more than Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 6.7 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 6.3 s |
Although Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d has more power, Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d and Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 1,138 km 707 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 649 km 403 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.7 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.3 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | MiniClubman (F54)JCW 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,138 km 707 mi | 649 km 403 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 153 g/km | 168 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d | Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 489 km (304 mi) more estimated range
- Has 205 L more trunk volume
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mini Clubman (F54) JCW 2.0
- Is 330 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























