Car comparison

Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TDIvsSuzuki Kizashi 2.4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011

2.0 TDI

170 hp1968 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2011-2013
VS

Suzuki Kizashi

2.4

178 hp2393 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan2009-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI

  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,455 kg
    3,208 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    142 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,296 km
    805 mi
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Most powerful
    178 hp
    133 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    119 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    461 L
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDISuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
170hp127kW
178hp133kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
230Nm170lb-ft
Curb weight
1,455kg3,208lb
1,494kg3,294lb
Gross weight
2,015kg4,442lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
74.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
63.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
32.1s
Calculated
35.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,296km805mi
Calculated
797km496mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
2,393cc146cu in
Length
4,661mm184in
4,650mm183in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,820mm72in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,470mm58in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,522mm60in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,575mm62in
Ground clearance-
135mm5in
Trunk volume
460L
-
Max trunk volume
833L
461L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
63L
CO2 emissions
142g/km
183g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDISuzuki Kizashi 2.4PowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI4,200 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,450 rpm
SuzukiKizashi2.46,500 rpm4,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDISuzukiKizashi2.4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.1 s
35.9 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
170 hp
127 kW
SuzukiKizashi2.4
178 hp
133 kW

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 has 8 hp more than Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI and Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
SuzukiKizashi2.4
230 Nm
170 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
SuzukiKizashi2.4
1,494 kg
3,294 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
229 km/h
142 mph
SuzukiKizashi2.4
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI8.4 s
SuzukiKizashi2.47.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI and Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
SuzukiKizashi2.4
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
1,296 km
805 mi
SuzukiKizashi2.4
797 km
496 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
170 hp
127 kW
8.4 s
229 km/h
142 mph
SuzukiKizashi2.4
178 hp
133 kW
7.8 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
8.4 s
SuzukiKizashi2.4
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDISuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
170 hp
127 kW
178 hp
133 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
230 Nm
170 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
7.8 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
1,494 kg
3,294 lb
Fuel consumption
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in
Range score
1,296 km
805 mi
797 km
496 mi
CO2 score
142 g/km
183 g/km
Trunk score
460 L
16.2 cu ft
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDISuzuki Kizashi 2.4
Consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.45 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.21 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used810 L214 US gal178 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,418 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Is 39 kg lighter
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 499 km (310 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 41 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 1 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI
Suzuki Kizashi 2.4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDIvsSeatExeo2.0 TDI
2.4
2.2 D-CAT
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsToyotaAvensis IIIFacelift 20122.2 D-CAT
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDIvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI
2.4
2.2 i-DTEC
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TDI
2.4
1.6 T4
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
2.4
2.2 i-DTEC Type S
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsHondaAccord VIII2.2 i-DTEC Type S
2.4
E 200
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
2.4
2.2 D-CAT
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsToyotaAvensis III2.2 D-CAT
2.4
1.8 TFSI
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI
2.4
C 220d
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d
2.4
2.0 TSI
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsVolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI
Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI vs Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster