Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220dvsSuzuki Kizashi 2.4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)

C 220d

170 hp2143 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2014-2016
VS

Suzuki Kizashi

2.4

178 hp2393 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan2009-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    233 km/h
    145 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.9 L/100 km
    60.3 mpg US
    72.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    117 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    911 km
    566 mi
  • Largest trunk
    480 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4

  • Most powerful
    178 hp
    133 kW
  • Lightest
    1,494 kg
    3,294 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    119 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220dSuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
170hp127kW
178hp133kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
230Nm170lb-ft
Curb weight
1,505kg3,318lb
1,494kg3,294lb
Gross weight
2,135kg4,707lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
72.3s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
63.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
29.2s
Calculated
35.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
911km566mi
Calculated
797km496mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,143cc131cu in
2,393cc146cu in
Length
4,686mm184in
4,650mm183in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,820mm72in
Height
1,442mm57in
1,470mm58in
Wheelbase
2,840mm112in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,570mm62in
1,575mm62in
Ground clearance-
135mm5in
Trunk volume
480L
-
Max trunk volume-
461L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
41L
63L
CO2 emissions
117g/km
183g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220dSuzuki Kizashi 2.4PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d: Power / Torque
  • Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d3,000-4,200 rpm1,400-2,800 rpm4,450 rpm
SuzukiKizashi2.46,500 rpm4,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220dSuzukiKizashi2.4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.2 s
35.9 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d
170 hp
127 kW
SuzukiKizashi2.4
178 hp
133 kW

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 has 8 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d and Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
SuzukiKizashi2.4
230 Nm
170 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
SuzukiKizashi2.4
1,494 kg
3,294 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d
233 km/h
145 mph
SuzukiKizashi2.4
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d7.8 s
SuzukiKizashi2.47.8 s

Although Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d and Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: 3.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
SuzukiKizashi2.4
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d
911 km
566 mi
SuzukiKizashi2.4
797 km
496 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d
170 hp
127 kW
7.8 s
233 km/h
145 mph
SuzukiKizashi2.4
178 hp
133 kW
7.8 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in
SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
7.8 s
SuzukiKizashi2.4
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220dSuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
170 hp
127 kW
178 hp
133 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
230 Nm
170 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.8 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
1,494 kg
3,294 lb
Fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in
Range score
911 km
566 mi
797 km
496 mi
CO2 score
117 g/km
183 g/km
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220dSuzuki Kizashi 2.4
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d

  • Has 170 Nm more
  • Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 114 km (71 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 19 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 66 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Is 11 kg lighter
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d
Suzuki Kizashi 2.4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

C 220d
C 180 1.6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6
2.4
2.2 D-CAT
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsToyotaAvensis IIIFacelift 20122.2 D-CAT
C 220d
C 180
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180
2.4
2.2 i-DTEC
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC
C 220d
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 220d
2.4
2.0 TDI
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
C 220d
C 180 1.6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.6
2.4
1.6 T4
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
C 220d
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
2.4
2.2 i-DTEC Type S
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsHondaAccord VIII2.2 i-DTEC Type S
C 220d
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
2.4
E 200
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d vs Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster