Car comparison

AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.8 TFSIvsSuzuki Kizashi 2.4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI A3 Sedan (8V)

1.8 TFSI

180 hp1798 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2013-2016
VS

Suzuki Kizashi

2.4

178 hp2393 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan2009-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.8 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,295 kg
    2,855 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    139 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    129 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    893 km
    555 mi
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSISuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
180hp134kW
178hp133kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
230Nm170lb-ft
Curb weight
1,295kg2,855lb
1,494kg3,294lb
Gross weight
1,845kg4,068lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
64.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
64.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
26.1s
Calculated
35.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
893km555mi
Calculated
797km496mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,798cc110cu in
2,393cc146cu in
Length
4,456mm175in
4,650mm183in
Width
1,796mm71in
1,820mm72in
Height
1,416mm56in
1,470mm58in
Wheelbase
2,637mm104in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,555mm61in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,526mm60in
1,575mm62in
Ground clearance-
135mm5in
Trunk volume
425L
-
Max trunk volume
880L
461L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
63L
CO2 emissions
129g/km
183g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.8 TFSISuzuki Kizashi 2.4PowerTorque
  • AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.8 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI5,100-6,200 rpm1,250-5,000 rpm6,450 rpm
SuzukiKizashi2.46,500 rpm4,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSISuzukiKizashi2.4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.1 s
35.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI
180 hp
134 kW
SuzukiKizashi2.4
178 hp
133 kW

AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.8 TFSI has 2 hp more than Suzuki Kizashi 2.4.

The biggest power difference is between Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 and AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.8 TFSI: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
SuzukiKizashi2.4
230 Nm
170 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI
1,295 kg
2,855 lb
SuzukiKizashi2.4
1,494 kg
3,294 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI
235 km/h
146 mph
SuzukiKizashi2.4
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI7.3 s
SuzukiKizashi2.47.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.8 TFSI and Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.8 TFSI and Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
SuzukiKizashi2.4
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI
893 km
555 mi
SuzukiKizashi2.4
797 km
496 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI
180 hp
134 kW
7.3 s
235 km/h
146 mph
SuzukiKizashi2.4
178 hp
133 kW
7.8 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,456 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in
SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.8 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
7.3 s
SuzukiKizashi2.4
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSISuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
178 hp
133 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
230 Nm
170 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.8 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,295 kg
2,855 lb
1,494 kg
3,294 lb
Fuel consumption
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,456 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,416 mm
55.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in
Range score
893 km
555 mi
797 km
496 mi
CO2 score
129 g/km
183 g/km
Trunk score
425 L
15.0 cu ft
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.8 TFSISuzuki Kizashi 2.4
Consumption5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.80 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.77 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used840 L222 US gal185 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,470 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.8 TFSI

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 199 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 95 km (59 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 54 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4

  • Has 36 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.8 TFSI
Suzuki Kizashi 2.4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.8 TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSIvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI
2.4
2.2 D-CAT
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsToyotaAvensis IIIFacelift 20122.2 D-CAT
1.8 TFSI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSIvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)40 TFSI
2.4
2.2 i-DTEC
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC
1.8 TFSI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSIvsAUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI
2.4
2.0 TDI
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
1.8 TFSI
1.8 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSIvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)1.8 TFSI
2.4
1.6 T4
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
1.8 TFSI
1.8 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSIvsAUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI
2.4
2.2 i-DTEC Type S
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsHondaAccord VIII2.2 i-DTEC Type S
1.8 TFSI
1.8 TFSI
VS
AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSIvsAUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)1.8 TFSI
2.4
E 200
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 1.8 TFSI vs Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster