Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TDIvsSeat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo ST
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,296 km805 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score92/100
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,515kg3,340lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 2,075kg4,575lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 80.6s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.1s Calculated | 36.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,296km805mi Calculated | 1,186km737mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,670mm184in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 442L |
| Max trunk volume | 833L | 1,354L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.1 s | 36.6 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 8.4 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 1,296 km 805 mi |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 1,186 km 737 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI | SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,296 km 805 mi | 1,186 km 737 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI | Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 110 km (68 mi) more estimated range
- Has 18 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























