Seat Exeo ST
Car comparison
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDIvsRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna III Grandtour
2.0 dCi FAP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Lightest1,515 kg3,340 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,186 km737 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score91/100
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
- Most powerful178 hp133 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Largest trunk508 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 178hp133kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,515kg3,340lb | 1,613kg3,556lb |
| Gross weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.6s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 77.3s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.6s Calculated | 44.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,186km737mi Calculated | 985km612mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,670mm184in | 4,803mm189in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,756mm109in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | - |
| Trunk volume | 442L | 508L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,354L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.6 s | 44.6 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW |
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP has 8 hp more than Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI and Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 8.7 s |
Although Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP has more power, Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI and Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI and Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 1,186 km 737 mi |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 985 km 612 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW | 8.7 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo ST2.0 TDI | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 178 hp 133 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,186 km 737 mi | 985 km 612 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI | Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TDI
- Is 98 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 201 km (125 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 66 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























