Car comparison

Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TDIvsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.6 T4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011

2.0 TDI

170 hp1968 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2011-2013
VS

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

1.6 T4

180 hp1596 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2013-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI

  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,455 kg
    3,208 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,296 km
    805 mi
  • Largest trunk
    460 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDIVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
Power
170hp127kW
180hp134kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,455kg3,208lb
1,495kg3,296lb
Gross weight
2,015kg4,442lb
2,020kg4,453lb
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
74.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
73.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
32.1s
Calculated
33.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton
Calculated
161Nm/t107lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,296km805mi
Calculated
1,164km723mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,596cc97cu in
Length
4,661mm184in
4,635mm182in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,776mm109in
Front track
1,522mm60in
1,588mm63in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,585mm62in
Ground clearance-
136mm5in
Trunk volume
460L
380L
Max trunk volume
833L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
68L
CO2 emissions
142g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDIVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4PowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI4,200 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,450 rpm
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T45,700 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm6,150 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDIVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.1 s
33.5 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
170 hp
127 kW
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
180 hp
134 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 has 10 hp more than Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
1,495 kg
3,296 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
229 km/h
142 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI8.4 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T48.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
1,296 km
805 mi
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
1,164 km
723 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
170 hp
127 kW
8.4 s
229 km/h
142 mph
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
180 hp
134 kW
8.3 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
8.4 s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDIVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
Power
170 hp
127 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.3 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
Fuel consumption
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
1,296 km
805 mi
1,164 km
723 mi
CO2 score
142 g/km
-
Trunk score
460 L
16.2 cu ft
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
120 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDIVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4
Consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.45 LC100 km10.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.21 LC100 mi16.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used810 L214 US gal178 UK gal870 L230 US gal191 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,418 LC/year1,523 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI

  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Is 40 kg lighter
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 133 km (82 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI
Volvo S60 II 1.6 T4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDIvsSeatExeo2.0 TDI
1.6 T4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDIvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI
1.6 T4
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TDI
1.6 T4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS902.0 D4
2.0 TDI
2.2 i-DTEC
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDIvsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC
1.6 T4
E 200
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
2.0 TDI
2.2 i-DTEC Type S
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDIvsHondaAccord VIII2.2 i-DTEC Type S
1.6 T4
2.2 D-CAT
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsToyotaAvensis IIIFacelift 20122.2 D-CAT
1.6 T4
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
2.0 TDI
2.2 D-CAT
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDIvsToyotaAvensis III2.2 D-CAT
Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI vs Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster