Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 200vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.6 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
1.6 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,164 km723 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.4s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 73.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.3s Calculated | 33.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t107lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 908km564mi Calculated | 1,164km723mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,596cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,879mm192in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,474mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,598mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,614mm64in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,600 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.3 s | 33.5 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW |
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 has 4 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 8.2 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 908 km 564 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 1,164 km 723 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.2 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.3 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 908 km 564 mi | 1,164 km 723 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 160 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 256 km (159 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























