Volkswagen Jetta VI
Car comparison
Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSIvsSuzuki Kizashi 2.4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSuzuki Kizashi
2.4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk510 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score86/100
Suzuki Kizashi 2.4
- Best estimated range797 km496 mi
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | SuzukiKizashi2.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 178hp133kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,494kg3,294lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.8s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 63.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.6s Calculated | 35.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated | 154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 797km496mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,393cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,644mm183in | 4,650mm183in |
| Width | 1,778mm70in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,482mm58in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,651mm104in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,538mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 139mm5in | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 510L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 461L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 183g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 6,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | SuzukiKizashi2.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.6 s | 35.9 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 178 hp 133 kW |
Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI has 22 hp more than Suzuki Kizashi 2.4.
The biggest power difference is between Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 and Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 1,494 kg 3,294 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 7.5 s |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI and Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 714 km 444 mi |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 797 km 496 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 178 hp 133 kW | 7.8 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SuzukiKizashi2.4 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI | SuzukiKizashi2.4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 178 hp 133 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,494 kg 3,294 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 797 km 496 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 183 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | 461 L 16.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI | Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Jetta VI 2.0 TSI
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 119 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 49 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Suzuki Kizashi 2.4
- Has 83 km (52 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























