Volkswagen Eos
Car comparison
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6vsRenault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna Coupe
3.5 V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,591 kg3,508 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score82/100
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Best estimated range647 km402 mi
- Largest trunk423 L
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,591kg3,508lb | 1,597kg3,521lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,953kg4,306lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 99.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 96.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 29.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 598km371mi Calculated | 647km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,597cc220cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,407mm174in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,791mm71in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 106mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 183L | 423L |
| Max trunk volume | 358L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 29.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW |
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 has 22 hp more than Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V and Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 6.9 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 598 km 371 mi |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 647 km 402 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.4 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenEos3.6 FSI V6 | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,591 kg 3,508 lb | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 598 km 371 mi | 647 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 183 L 6.5 cu ft | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6 | Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Eos 3.6 FSI V6
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 6 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Has 49 km (31 mi) more estimated range
- Has 240 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























