Renault Laguna Coupe
Car comparison
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24VvsRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna III Grandtour
2.0 dCi FAP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range985 km612 mi
- Largest trunk508 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful238 hp177 kW
- Lightest1,597 kg3,521 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 238hp177kW | 178hp133kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,597kg3,521lb | 1,613kg3,556lb |
| Gross weight | 1,953kg4,306lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 77.3s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.8s Calculated | 44.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 647km402mi Calculated | 985km612mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,803mm189in |
| Width | 1,811mm71in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,400mm55in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,756mm109in |
| Trunk volume | 423L | 508L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.8 s | 44.6 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW |
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V has 60 hp more than Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 7.4 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V and Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 3.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 647 km 402 mi |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 985 km 612 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.4 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW | 8.7 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 238 hp 177 kW | 178 hp 133 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 647 km 402 mi | 985 km 612 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V | Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Has 60 hp more
- Is 16 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 32 km/h (20 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 338 km (210 mi) more estimated range
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























