Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007
Car comparison
Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007 2.4 D5vsRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna III Grandtour
2.0 dCi FAP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,453 kg3,203 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score90/100
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
- Best estimated range985 km612 mi
- Largest trunk508 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 178hp133kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,453kg3,203lb | 1,613kg3,556lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 77.3s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.3s Calculated | 44.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 952km592mi Calculated | 985km612mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,522mm178in | 4,803mm189in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,756mm109in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | - |
| Trunk volume | 417L | 508L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,307L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.3 s | 44.6 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 180 hp 134 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW |
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 has 2 hp more than Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 1,453 kg 3,203 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 8.0 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 and Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 952 km 592 mi |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 985 km 612 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.0 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW | 8.7 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.4 D5 | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 178 hp 133 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,453 kg 3,203 lb | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 952 km 592 mi | 985 km 612 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5 | Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.4 D5
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
- Has 33 km (20 mi) more estimated range
- Has 91 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























