Renault Laguna Coupe
Car comparison
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24VvsRenault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane III CC
GT 2.0 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful238 hp177 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk423 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range741 km460 mi
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 238hp177kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,597kg3,521lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 1,953kg4,306lb | 1,926kg4,246lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 109.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.8s Calculated | 43.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 647km402mi Calculated | 741km460mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,485mm177in |
| Width | 1,811mm71in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,400mm55in | 1,434mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,609mm103in |
| Front track | - | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 423L | 211L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 417L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 188g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.8 s | 43.7 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V has 58 hp more than Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 58 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 7.4 s |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V and Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 647 km 402 mi |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 741 km 460 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.4 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 238 hp 177 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 647 km 402 mi | 741 km 460 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 188 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V | Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Has 58 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 212 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe
- Is 57 kg lighter
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 94 km (58 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























