Renault Laguna Coupe
Car comparison
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24VvsRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna III
2.0 dCi FAP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,539 kg3,393 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,015 km631 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful238 hp177 kW
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 238hp177kW | 178hp133kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,597kg3,521lb | 1,539kg3,393lb |
| Gross weight | 1,953kg4,306lb | 2,089kg4,605lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 93.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.8s Calculated | 45.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 647km402mi Calculated | 1,015km631mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,695mm185in |
| Width | 1,811mm71in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,400mm55in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,756mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,512mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 423L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,377L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.8 s | 45.0 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW |
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V has 60 hp more than Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 7.4 s |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V and Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 3.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 647 km 402 mi |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 1,015 km 631 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.4 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW | 8.5 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 238 hp 177 kW | 178 hp 133 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 647 km 402 mi | 1,015 km 631 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V | Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Has 60 hp more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 58 kg lighter
- Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 368 km (229 mi) more estimated range
- Has 27 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























