Car comparison

Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCevsRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Megane III

GT 2.0 TCe

180 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2009-2012
VS

Renault Laguna III

2.0 dCi FAP

178 hp1995 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2008-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,015 km
    631 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Lightest
    1,320 kg
    2,910 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCeRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
180hp134kW
178hp133kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,320kg2,910lb
1,539kg3,393lb
Gross weight
1,830kg4,034lb
2,089kg4,605lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
89.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
93.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
34.4s
Calculated
45.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
779km484mi
Calculated
1,015km631mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,295mm169in
4,695mm185in
Width
1,808mm71in
1,811mm71in
Height
1,471mm58in
1,445mm57in
Wheelbase
2,641mm104in
2,756mm109in
Front track
1,546mm61in
1,557mm61in
Rear track
1,547mm61in
1,512mm60in
Ground clearance
120mm5in
120mm5in
Trunk volume
405L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,162L
1,377L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
66L
CO2 emissions
178g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCeRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAPPowerTorque
  • Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
  • Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe5,500 rpm2,250 rpm5,750 rpm
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP3,750 rpm2,000 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCeRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.4 s
45.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
180 hp
134 kW
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
178 hp
133 kW

Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe has 2 hp more than Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
1,320 kg
2,910 lb
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
1,539 kg
3,393 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
230 km/h
143 mph
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe7.8 s
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP8.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe and Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
779 km
484 mi
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
1,015 km
631 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
180 hp
134 kW
7.8 s
230 km/h
143 mph
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
178 hp
133 kW
8.5 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
405 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,295 mm
169.1 in
Height
1,471 mm
57.9 in
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,695 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.8 s
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCeRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
180 hp
134 kW
178 hp
133 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,320 kg
2,910 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
405 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,295 mm
169.1 in
Height
1,471 mm
57.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,695 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
Range score
779 km
484 mi
1,015 km
631 mi
CO2 score
178 g/km
-
Trunk score
405 L
14.3 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Megane III GT 2.0 TCeRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km11.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi18.31 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal975 L258 US gal214 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,706 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 219 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP

  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 236 km (147 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GT 2.0 TCe
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCevsRenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
GT 2.0 TCe
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCevsRenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
GT 2.0 TCe
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
VS
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCevsRenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy TCe
2.0 dCi FAP
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna2.9 24V
GT 2.0 TCe
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCevsRenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 i 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo
GT 2.0 TCe
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCevsRenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
GT 2.0 TCe
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCevsRenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe
2.0 dCi FAP
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna Grandtour2.9 24V
Renault Megane III GT 2.0 TCe vs Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP - car comparison - FastVsFaster