Renault Megane II Coupe
Car comparison
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane III CC
GT 2.0 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful224 hp167 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,355 kg2,987 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk330 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions188 g/km
- Best estimated range741 km460 mi
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,355kg2,987lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 1,926kg4,246lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 109.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 43.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 741km460mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,228mm166in | 4,485mm177in |
| Width | - | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,436mm57in | 1,434mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,617mm103in | 2,609mm103in |
| Front track | 1,517mm60in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,521mm60in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 211L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,190L | 417L |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 209g/km | 188g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 2,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 43.7 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW |
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V has 44 hp more than Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe and Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: 44 hp (33 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 6.5 s |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe: 2.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe and Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 682 km 424 mi |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 741 km 460 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | RenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 741 km 460 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 209 g/km | 188 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V | Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Has 44 hp more
- Is 185 kg lighter
- Is 2.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 119 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Renault Megane III CC GT 2.0 TCe
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 59 km (37 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 21 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























