Volkswagen Eos
Car comparison
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6vsRenault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna Coupe
3.5 V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed247 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lightest1,539 kg3,393 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score82/100
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Best estimated range647 km402 mi
- Largest trunk423 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 238hp177kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,539kg3,393lb | 1,597kg3,521lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 1,953kg4,306lb |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 97.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated | 96.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.0s Calculated | 29.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 598km371mi Calculated | 647km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,168cc193cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,407mm174in | 4,643mm183in |
| Width | 1,791mm71in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 205L | 423L |
| Max trunk volume | 380L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 6,250 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.0 s | 29.7 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW |
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 has 12 hp more than Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 7.3 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 and Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 598 km 371 mi |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 647 km 402 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.3 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 238 hp 177 kW | 7.4 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenEos3.2 V6 | RenaultLaguna Coupe3.5 V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 238 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,539 kg 3,393 lb | 1,597 kg 3,521 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 598 km 371 mi | 647 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 | Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
- Has 12 hp more
- Is 58 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna Coupe 3.5 V6 24V
- Has 49 km (31 mi) more estimated range
- Has 218 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























