Car comparison

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Outlander I

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

202 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2004-2006

Seat Altea Freetrack

2.0 FSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2007-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI

Quickest 0-100 km/h
7.5 s
Lightest
1,571 kg
3,463 lb
Best power-to-weight
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
12.8 L/100 km
18.4 mpg US
22.1 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Best estimated range
638 km
397 mi
Largest trunk
490 L
Best overall score
59/100
Best economy score
82/100
Best practicality score
83/100

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

Fastest top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Most powerful
202 hp
151 kW
Highest torque
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
Best performance score
48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo	SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
Power	202hp151kW	200hp149kW
Torque	303Nm223lb-ft	280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight	1,595kg3,516lb	1,571kg3,463lb
Gross weight	2,070kg4,564lb	2,191kg4,830lb
Top speed	220 km/h 137 mph	214 km/h 133 mph
To 99% top speed	84.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated	78.4s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	7.7s	7.5s
0-200 km/h	39.0s Calculated	42.3s Calculated
0-60 mph	7.3s Calculated	7.1s Calculated
Fuel consumption	10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK	9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK	12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK	7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Quarter mile	15.6s Calculated	15.5s Calculated
Power-to-weight	127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated	127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated	178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	600km373mi Calculated	638km397mi Calculated
Displacement	1,997cc122cu in	1,984cc121cu in
Length	4,550mm179in	4,493mm177in
Width	1,750mm69in	1,788mm70in
Height	1,620mm64in	1,622mm64in
Wheelbase	2,625mm103in	2,576mm101in
Front track	1,495mm59in	1,542mm61in
Rear track	1,495mm59in	1,527mm60in
Trunk volume	402L	490L
Max trunk volume	1,705L	-
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	60L	60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboSeat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSIPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo	5,500 rpm	3,500 rpm	5,750 rpm
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI	5,700 rpm	3,500 rpm	5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo	SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	7.3 s	7.1 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	7.7 s	7.5 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	39.0 s	42.3 s
Top speed	220 km/h 137 mph	214 km/h 133 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.5 s	2.5 s
330 ft 101 m	6.7 s	6.6 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.2 s	10.0 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.1 s	13.0 s
1/4 mile 402 m	15.6 s	15.5 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	147 km/h 91 mph	147 km/h 91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo	202 hp 151 kW
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI	200 hp 149 kW

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo has 2 hp more than Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo	303 Nm 223 lb-ft
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI	280 Nm 207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo	1,595 kg 3,516 lb
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI	1,571 kg 3,463 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo	220 km/h 137 mph
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI	214 km/h 133 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo	7.7 s
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI	7.5 s

Although Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo has more power, Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo	10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI	9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo	127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI	127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo	600 km 373 mi
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI	638 km 397 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo	202 hp 151 kW	7.7 s	220 km/h 137 mph
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI	200 hp 149 kW	7.5 s	214 km/h 133 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

Power	202 hp 151 kW
0-100 km/h	7.7 s
Top speed 220 km/h 137 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	402 L 14.2 cu ft
Length	4,550 mm 179.1 in
Height	1,620 mm 63.8 in

SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI

Power	200 hp 149 kW
0-100 km/h	7.5 s
Top speed 214 km/h 133 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	490 L 17.3 cu ft
Length	4,493 mm 176.9 in
Height	1,622 mm 63.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

Power	202 hp 151 kW
0-100 km/h	7.7 s
Top speed 220 km/h 137 mph

10.0 L/100 km

23.5 mpg US

28.2 mpg UK

SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI

Power	200 hp 149 kW
0-100 km/h	7.5 s
Top speed 214 km/h 133 mph

9.4 L/100 km

25.0 mpg US

30.1 mpg UK

Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo	10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK	7.7 s
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI	9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK	7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo	127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp	10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK
SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI	127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp	9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI

Power

202 hp

151 kW

200 hp

149 kW

Torque

303 Nm

223 lb-ft

280 Nm

207 lb-ft

Acceleration

7.7 s

7.5 s

Top speed

220 km/h

137 mph

214 km/h

133 mph

Lightness

1,595 kg

3,516 lb

1,571 kg

3,463 lb

Fuel consumption

10.0 L/100 km

23.5 mpg US

28.2 mpg UK

9.4 L/100 km

25.0 mpg US

30.1 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	402 L 14.2 cu ft
Length	4,550 mm 179.1 in
Height	1,620 mm 63.8 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	490 L 17.3 cu ft
Length	4,493 mm 176.9 in
Height	1,622 mm 63.9 in

Range score

600 km

373 mi

638 km

397 mi

Trunk score

402 L

14.2 cu ft

490 L

17.3 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

127 hp/t

94 kW/t

7.9 kg/hp

127 hp/t

95 kW/t

7.9 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo	Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI
Consumption	10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK	9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	17.50 LC100 km	16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	28.16 LC100 mi	26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal	1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,625 LC/year	2,468 LC/year