Car comparison

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsVolkswagen Tiguan I · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Outlander I

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

202 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2004-2006
VS

Volkswagen Tiguan I · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2011-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Most powerful
    211 hp
    157 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    132 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.6 L/100 km
    20.3 mpg US
    24.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    753 km
    468 mi
  • Largest trunk
    470 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
202hp151kW
211hp157kW
Torque
303Nm223lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,595kg3,516lb
1,598kg3,523lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
2,210kg4,872lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
84.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
75.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
39.0s
Calculated
40.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
600km373mi
Calculated
753km468mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,550mm179in
4,426mm174in
Width
1,750mm69in
1,809mm71in
Height
1,620mm64in
1,703mm67in
Wheelbase
2,625mm103in
2,604mm103in
Front track
1,495mm59in
1,569mm62in
Rear track
1,495mm59in
1,571mm62in
Ground clearance-
200mm8in
Trunk volume
402L
470L
Max trunk volume
1,705L
1,510L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
64L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboVolkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo5,500 rpm3,500 rpm5,750 rpm
VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI5,300-6,200 rpm1,700-5,200 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.0 s
40.3 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
147 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW

Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has 9 hp more than Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo and Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,598 kg
3,523 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
220 km/h
137 mph
VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has more power, Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo and Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
600 km
373 mi
VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
753 km
468 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
7.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph
VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.8 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,426 mm
174.3 in
Height
1,703 mm
67.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.7 s
VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
202 hp
151 kW
211 hp
157 kW
Torque
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
1,598 kg
3,523 lb
Fuel consumption
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,426 mm
174.3 in
Height
1,703 mm
67.0 in
Range score
600 km
373 mi
753 km
468 mi
Trunk score
402 L
14.2 cu ft
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboVolkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Consumption10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.50 LC100 km14.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.16 LC100 mi23.94 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,625 LC/year2,231 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

  • Has 23 Nm more
  • Is 3 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 153 km (95 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 68 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Volkswagen Tiguan I 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo vs Volkswagen Tiguan I · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster