Mitsubishi Outlander I
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsVolkswagen Tiguan I · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan I · Facelift 2011
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range753 km468 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Highest torque303 Nm223 lb-ft
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 202hp151kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 303Nm223lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,598kg3,523lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,210kg4,872lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 75.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.0s Calculated | 40.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 600km373mi Calculated | 753km468mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 4,426mm174in |
| Width | 1,750mm69in | 1,809mm71in |
| Height | 1,620mm64in | 1,703mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,604mm103in |
| Front track | 1,495mm59in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,495mm59in | 1,571mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 402L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,705L | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | 5,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.0 s | 40.3 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | 202 hp 151 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has 9 hp more than Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo and Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | 303 Nm 223 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,598 kg 3,523 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
Although Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has more power, Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo and Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | 600 km 373 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 753 km 468 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | 202 hp 151 kW | 7.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 202 hp 151 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 303 Nm 223 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,598 kg 3,523 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 600 km 373 mi | 753 km 468 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo | Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
- Has 23 Nm more
- Is 3 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Has 9 hp more
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 153 km (95 mi) more estimated range
- Has 68 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























