Car comparison

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Outlander I

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

202 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2004-2006
VS

Seat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009

2.0 TFSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2009-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Lightest
    1,571 kg
    3,463 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    127 hp/t
    95 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.4 L/100 km
    25.0 mpg US
    30.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.8 L/100 km
    18.4 mpg US
    22.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    638 km
    397 mi
  • Largest trunk
    490 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100
  • Best practicality score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
Power
202hp151kW
200hp149kW
Torque
303Nm223lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,595kg3,516lb
1,571kg3,463lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
2,191kg4,830lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
To 99% top speed
84.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
77.7s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
39.0s
Calculated
42.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
600km373mi
Calculated
638km397mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,550mm179in
4,493mm177in
Width
1,750mm69in
1,788mm70in
Height
1,620mm64in
1,622mm64in
Wheelbase
2,625mm103in
2,576mm101in
Front track
1,495mm59in
1,542mm61in
Rear track
1,495mm59in
1,527mm60in
Trunk volume
402L
490L
Max trunk volume
1,705L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboSeat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSIPowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo5,500 rpm3,500 rpm5,750 rpm
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI5,700 rpm3,500 rpm5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.0 s
42.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
147 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
200 hp
149 kW

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo has 2 hp more than Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
1,571 kg
3,463 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
220 km/h
137 mph
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
214 km/h
133 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo7.7 s
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI7.5 s

Although Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo has more power, Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
600 km
373 mi
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
638 km
397 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
7.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.5 s
214 km/h
133 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,493 mm
176.9 in
Height
1,622 mm
63.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.7 s
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
Power
202 hp
151 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Lightness
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
1,571 kg
3,463 lb
Fuel consumption
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,493 mm
176.9 in
Height
1,622 mm
63.9 in
Range score
600 km
373 mi
638 km
397 mi
Trunk score
402 L
14.2 cu ft
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboSeat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI
Consumption10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.50 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.16 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,625 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 23 Nm more
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Seat Altea Freetrack Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI

  • Is 24 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 38 km (24 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 88 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 TFSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
3.0d
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
2.0 TFSI
2.0 FSI
VS
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSIvsSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSIvsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
23d
VS
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSIvsBMWX1 (E84)23d
2.0 TFSI
GLK 300 V6
VS
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSIvsMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 300 V6
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSIvsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
2.0 TFSI
Cooper S 1.6
VS
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSIvsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.5 XT
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSubaruForester III2.5 XT
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo vs Seat Altea Freetrack · Facelift 2009 2.0 TFSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster