Car comparison

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsBMW X3 (E83) 3.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Outlander I

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

202 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2004-2006
VS

BMW X3 (E83)

3.0d

218 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2004-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d

  • Most powerful
    218 hp
    163 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    779 km
    484 mi
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
Power
202hp151kW
218hp163kW
Torque
303Nm223lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,595kg3,516lb
1,925kg4,244lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
2,355kg5,192lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
84.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
83.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
39.0s
Calculated
50.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
600km373mi
Calculated
779km484mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,550mm179in
4,569mm180in
Width
1,750mm69in
1,853mm73in
Height
1,620mm64in
1,674mm66in
Wheelbase
2,625mm103in
2,795mm110in
Front track
1,495mm59in
1,524mm60in
Rear track
1,495mm59in
1,542mm61in
Ground clearance-
200mm8in
Trunk volume
402L
500L
Max trunk volume
1,705L
1,560L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
67L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboBMW X3 (E83) 3.0dPowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: Power / Torque
  • BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo5,500 rpm3,500 rpm5,750 rpm
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d4,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.0 s
50.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
218 hp
163 kW

BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d has 16 hp more than Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo and BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d: 16 hp (12 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
1,925 kg
4,244 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
220 km/h
137 mph
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo7.7 s
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d7.7 s

Although BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d has more power, Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
600 km
373 mi
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
779 km
484 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
7.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
218 hp
163 kW
7.7 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,569 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.7 s
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
BMWX3 (E83)3.0d
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
Power
202 hp
151 kW
218 hp
163 kW
Torque
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
1,925 kg
4,244 lb
Fuel consumption
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,569 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Range score
600 km
373 mi
779 km
484 mi
Trunk score
402 L
14.2 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
113 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboBMW X3 (E83) 3.0d
Consumption10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.50 LC100 km15.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.16 LC100 mi24.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,625 LC/year2,258 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

  • Is 330 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d

  • Has 16 hp more
  • Has 197 Nm more
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 179 km (111 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 98 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
3.0d
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
3.0d
3.0si
VS
BMWX3 (E83)3.0dvsBMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 FSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
3.0d
28i
VS
BMWX3 (E83)3.0dvsBMWX3 (F25)28i
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
3.0d
20d
VS
BMWX3 (E83)3.0dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
3.0d
20d
VS
BMWX3 (E83)3.0dvsBMWX3 (G45)20d
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
3.0d
20d
VS
BMWX3 (E83)3.0dvsBMWX3 (G01)20d
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
3.0d
20d
VS
BMWX3 (E83)3.0dvsBMWX3 (G01 LCI)Facelift 202120d
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo vs BMW X3 (E83) 3.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster