Car comparison

BMW X1 (E84) 23dvsMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (E84)

23d

204 hp1995 ccDieselAWDManualTwin-turboSUV2009-2012
VS

Mitsubishi Outlander I

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

202 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2004-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X1 (E84) 23d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    223 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,585 kg
    3,494 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,017 km
    632 mi
  • Largest trunk
    420 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    80/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (E84)23dMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
204hp152kW
202hp151kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
303Nm223lb-ft
Curb weight
1,585kg3,494lb
1,595kg3,516lb
Gross weight
2,150kg4,740lb
2,070kg4,564lb
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
76.6s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
84.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
34.0s
Calculated
39.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton
Calculated
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,017km632mi
Calculated
600km373mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,454mm175in
4,550mm179in
Width
1,798mm71in
1,750mm69in
Height
1,545mm61in
1,620mm64in
Wheelbase
2,760mm109in
2,625mm103in
Front track
1,500mm59in
1,495mm59in
Rear track
1,529mm60in
1,495mm59in
Ground clearance
194mm8in
-
Trunk volume
420L
402L
Max trunk volume
1,350L
1,705L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (E84) 23dMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboPowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (E84) 23d: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (E84)23d4,400 rpm2,000-2,250 rpm4,650 rpm
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo5,500 rpm3,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (E84)23dMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.0 s
39.0 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)23d
204 hp
152 kW
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW

BMW X1 (E84) 23d has 2 hp more than Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo and BMW X1 (E84) 23d: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)23d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
303 Nm
223 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)23d
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
1,595 kg
3,516 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)23d
223 km/h
139 mph
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)23d7.3 s
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo7.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 23d and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)23d
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (E84) 23d and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 4.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)23d
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (E84)23d
1,017 km
632 mi
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
600 km
373 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (E84)23d
204 hp
152 kW
7.3 s
223 km/h
139 mph
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
7.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (E84)23d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,454 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,545 mm
60.8 in
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (E84)23d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

BMW X1 (E84) 23d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (E84)23d
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.3 s
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (E84)23d
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (E84)23dMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
204 hp
152 kW
202 hp
151 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.7 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,454 mm
175.4 in
Height
1,545 mm
60.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
Range score
1,017 km
632 mi
600 km
373 mi
Trunk score
420 L
14.8 cu ft
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (E84) 23dMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km17.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi28.16 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year2,625 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (E84) 23d

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 97 Nm more
  • Is 10 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 417 km (259 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 18 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (E84) 23d
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

23d
25d
VS
BMWX1 (E84)23dvsBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201225d
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
3.0d
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
23d
20i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)23dvsBMWX1 (F48)20i
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 FSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
23d
23i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)23dvsBMWX1 (U11)23i
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
23d
28i
VS
BMWX1 (E84)23dvsBMWX3 (F25)28i
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
23d
20d
VS
BMWX1 (E84)23dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201420d
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
GLK 280 V6
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
BMW X1 (E84) 23d vs Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster