Car comparison

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsMercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Outlander I

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

202 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2004-2006
VS

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204)

GLK 280 V6

231 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2008-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Highest torque
    303 Nm
    223 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,595 kg
    3,516 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.0 L/100 km
    23.5 mpg US
    28.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.1 L/100 km
    16.7 mpg US
    20.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    80/100

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Most powerful
    231 hp
    172 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    132 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    629 km
    391 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
Power
202hp151kW
231hp172kW
Torque
303Nm223lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,595kg3,516lb
1,755kg3,869lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
2,480kg5,467lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
84.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
39.0s
Calculated
49.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
600km373mi
Calculated
629km391mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
2,996cc183cu in
Length
4,550mm179in
4,528mm178in
Width
1,750mm69in
1,840mm72in
Height
1,620mm64in
1,689mm66in
Wheelbase
2,625mm103in
2,755mm108in
Front track
1,495mm59in
1,567mm62in
Rear track
1,495mm59in
1,569mm62in
Ground clearance-
201mm8in
Trunk volume
402L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,705L
1,550L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboMercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6PowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo5,500 rpm3,500 rpm5,750 rpm
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V66,000 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.0 s
49.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
231 hp
172 kW

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6 has 29 hp more than Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6: 29 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
1,755 kg
3,869 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
220 km/h
137 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo7.7 s
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V67.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6 and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
600 km
373 mi
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
629 km
391 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
7.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
231 hp
172 kW
7.6 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,528 mm
178.3 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.7 s
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6
Power
202 hp
151 kW
231 hp
172 kW
Torque
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.6 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
1,755 kg
3,869 lb
Fuel consumption
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,528 mm
178.3 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
Range score
600 km
373 mi
629 km
391 mi
Trunk score
402 L
14.2 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboMercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6
Consumption10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.50 LC100 km18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.16 LC100 mi29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,625 LC/year2,756 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

  • Has 3 Nm more
  • Is 160 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6

  • Has 29 hp more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 48 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
3.0d
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
GLK 280 V6
GLK 350 CDI V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6vsMercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 FSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
GLK 280 V6
GL 450 CDI
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6vsMercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 CDI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
GLK 280 V6
GL 350 BlueTEC
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 350 BlueTEC
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
GLK 280 V6
2.5 XT
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6vsSubaruForester III2.5 XT
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
GLK 280 V6
GLA 250
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6vsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
23d
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsBMWX1 (E84)23d
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo vs Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster