Car comparison

BMW X5 (E70) 3.0sivsMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X5 (E70)

3.0si

272 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2007-2008
VS

Mitsubishi Outlander I

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

202 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2004-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X5 (E70) 3.0si

  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    272 hp
    203 kW
  • Highest torque
    315 Nm
    232 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    131 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.2 L/100 km
    17.8 mpg US
    21.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    833 km
    518 mi
  • Largest trunk
    620 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Lightest
    1,595 kg
    3,516 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.0 L/100 km
    23.5 mpg US
    28.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    80/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX5 (E70)3.0siMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
272hp203kW
202hp151kW
Torque
315Nm232lb-ft
303Nm223lb-ft
Curb weight
2,075kg4,575lb
1,595kg3,516lb
Gross weight
2,680kg5,908lb
2,070kg4,564lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
100.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
84.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
40.6s
Calculated
39.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.9s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton
Calculated
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
833km518mi
Calculated
600km373mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,996cc183cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,854mm191in
4,550mm179in
Width
1,933mm76in
1,750mm69in
Height
1,739mm68in
1,620mm64in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,625mm103in
Front track
1,576mm62in
1,495mm59in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,495mm59in
Trunk volume
620L
402L
Max trunk volume-
1,705L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X5 (E70) 3.0siMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboPowerTorque
  • BMW X5 (E70) 3.0si: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX5 (E70)3.0si6,650 rpm2,750 rpm6,900 rpm
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo5,500 rpm3,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX5 (E70)3.0siMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.6 s
39.0 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.9 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
89 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 (E70)3.0si
272 hp
203 kW
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW

BMW X5 (E70) 3.0si has 70 hp more than Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo and BMW X5 (E70) 3.0si: 70 hp (52 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 (E70)3.0si
315 Nm
232 lb-ft
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
303 Nm
223 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 (E70)3.0si
2,075 kg
4,575 lb
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
1,595 kg
3,516 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 (E70)3.0si
225 km/h
140 mph
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 (E70)3.0si8.1 s
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo7.7 s

Although BMW X5 (E70) 3.0si has more power, Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo and BMW X5 (E70) 3.0si: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 (E70)3.0si
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 (E70)3.0si
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 (E70)3.0si
833 km
518 mi
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
600 km
373 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX5 (E70)3.0si
272 hp
203 kW
8.1 s
225 km/h
140 mph
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
7.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX5 (E70)3.0si
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
620 L
21.9 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,739 mm
68.5 in
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX5 (E70)3.0si
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

BMW X5 (E70) 3.0si is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX5 (E70)3.0si
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
8.1 s
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX5 (E70)3.0si
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX5 (E70)3.0siMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
272 hp
203 kW
202 hp
151 kW
Torque
315 Nm
232 lb-ft
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
7.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
2,075 kg
4,575 lb
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
Fuel consumption
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
620 L
21.9 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,739 mm
68.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
Range score
833 km
518 mi
600 km
373 mi
Trunk score
620 L
21.9 cu ft
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X5 (E70) 3.0siMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.85 LC100 km17.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.73 LC100 mi28.16 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,678 LC/year2,625 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X5 (E70) 3.0si

  • Has 70 hp more
  • Has 12 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 233 km (145 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 218 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

  • Is 480 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X5 (E70) 3.0si
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0si
35i
VS
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sivsBMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201035i
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
3.0d
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
3.0si
4.6is
VS
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sivsBMWX5 (E53)4.6is
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 FSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
3.0si
30d
VS
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sivsBMWX5 (F15)30d
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
3.0si
30d
VS
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sivsBMWX5 (G05)30d
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
3.0si
30d
VS
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sivsBMWX5 (G05 LCI)Facelift 202330d
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
3.0si
3.0si
VS
BMWX5 (E70)3.0sivsBMWX3 (E83)Facelift 20063.0si
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
BMW X5 (E70) 3.0si vs Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster