Car comparison

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsMini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Outlander I

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

202 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2004-2006
VS

Mini Countryman (R60)

Cooper S 1.6

184 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2010-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Lightest
    1,310 kg
    2,888 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    140 hp/t
    105 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    770 km
    479 mi
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    202 hp
    151 kW
  • Highest torque
    303 Nm
    223 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    402 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best practicality score
    80/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
Power
202hp151kW
184hp137kW
Torque
303Nm223lb-ft
260Nm192lb-ft
Curb weight
1,595kg3,516lb
1,310kg2,888lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
1,780kg3,924lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
84.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
71.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
39.0s
Calculated
38.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
600km373mi
Calculated
770km479mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,550mm179in
4,110mm162in
Width
1,750mm69in
1,789mm70in
Height
1,620mm64in
1,561mm61in
Wheelbase
2,625mm103in
2,595mm102in
Front track
1,495mm59in
1,525mm60in
Rear track
1,495mm59in
1,551mm61in
Ground clearance-
149mm6in
Trunk volume
402L
350L
Max trunk volume
1,705L
1,170L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
60L
47L
CO2 emissions-
143g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboMini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6PowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo5,500 rpm3,500 rpm5,750 rpm
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.65,500 rpm1,700-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.0 s
38.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
184 hp
137 kW

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo has 18 hp more than Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6 and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 18 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
260 Nm
192 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
1,310 kg
2,888 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
220 km/h
137 mph
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo7.7 s
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.67.6 s

Although Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo has more power, Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6 and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6 and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 3.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
600 km
373 mi
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
770 km
479 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
7.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
184 hp
137 kW
7.6 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
4 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,110 mm
161.8 in
Height
1,561 mm
61.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.7 s
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
Power
202 hp
151 kW
184 hp
137 kW
Torque
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
260 Nm
192 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.6 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
Fuel consumption
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
4 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,110 mm
161.8 in
Height
1,561 mm
61.5 in
Range score
600 km
373 mi
770 km
479 mi
CO2 score
-
143 g/km
Trunk score
402 L
14.2 cu ft
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
140 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboMini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6
Consumption10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.50 LC100 km10.67 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.16 LC100 mi17.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal915 L242 US gal201 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,625 LC/year1,601 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

  • Has 18 hp more
  • Has 43 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 52 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6

  • Is 285 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 170 km (106 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
3.0d
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 FSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
Cooper S 1.6
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
Cooper S 1.6
20i
VS
MiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6vsBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201220i
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
23d
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsBMWX1 (E84)23d
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo vs Mini Countryman (R60) Cooper S 1.6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster