Seat Altea Freetrack
Car comparison
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSIvsMercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLK (X204)
GLK 280 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed214 km/h133 mph
- Lightest1,571 kg3,463 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range638 km397 mi
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,571kg3,463lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Gross weight | 2,191kg4,830lb | 2,480kg5,467lb |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.4s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.3s Calculated | 49.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 638km397mi Calculated | 629km391mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,493mm177in | 4,528mm178in |
| Width | 1,788mm70in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,622mm64in | 1,689mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,576mm101in | 2,755mm108in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,527mm60in | 1,569mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 201mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.3 s | 49.1 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 | 231 hp 172 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6 has 31 hp more than Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6: 31 hp (23 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 1,571 kg 3,463 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 | 7.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6 has more power, Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 638 km 397 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 | 629 km 391 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)GLK 280 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,571 kg 3,463 lb | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 638 km 397 mi | 629 km 391 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI | Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI
- Is 184 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 km (6 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) GLK 280 V6
- Has 31 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























