Mitsubishi Lancer IX
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0vsToyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Camry VII (XV50)
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,365 kg3,009 lb
- Best power-to-weight176 hp/t131 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6
- Most powerful249 hp186 kW
- Highest torque346 Nm255 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 249hp186kW |
| Torque | 309Nm228lb-ft | 346Nm255lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,365kg3,009lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 56.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.6s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 702km436mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,570mm180in | 4,825mm190in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,505mm59in | 1,480mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,635mm104in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,530mm60in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 506L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0: Power / Torque
- Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 6,200 rpm | 4,700 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.6 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 249 hp 186 kW |
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6 has 9 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 309 Nm 228 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 7.0 s |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 7.1 s |
Although Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6 has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | 249 hp 186 kW | 7.1 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0 | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 249 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 309 Nm 228 lb-ft | 346 Nm 255 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 702 km 436 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 506 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer IX Ralliart 2.0
- Is 250 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 3.5 V6
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 37 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























