Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 · Stage 3vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 · Stage 2vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 · Stage 1vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
2.0 (Stage 2)
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
2.0 (Stage 1)
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 397 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed287 km/h178 mph
- Most powerful397 hp296 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lightest1,445 kg3,186 lb
- Best power-to-weight275 hp/t205 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions258 g/km
- Best estimated range505 km314 mi
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 397hp296kW+132 hp | 344hp257kW+79 hp | 313hp233kW+48 hp | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft+195 Nm | 479Nm353lb-ft+124 Nm | 433Nm319lb-ft+78 Nm | 355Nm262lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,445kg3,186lb |
| Gross weight | 1,885kg4,156lb | 1,885kg4,156lb | 1,885kg4,156lb | 1,885kg4,156lb |
| Top speed | 287 km/h 178 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | 267 km/h 166 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 45.8s99% target: 284 km/h / 177 mph-9.1 s Calculated | 52.3s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph-2.6 s Calculated | 52.8s99% target: 264 km/h / 164 mph-2.1 s Calculated | 54.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s-1.4 s | 5.2s-0.9 s | 5.5s-0.6 s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.6s-7.4 s Calculated | 14.2s-5.8 s Calculated | 16.0s-3.9 s Calculated | 20.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s-1.3 s Calculated | 5.0s-0.9 s Calculated | 5.3s-0.6 s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s-1.6 s Calculated | 13.0s-1.1 s Calculated | 13.4s-0.7 s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 275hp/t205kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated | 238hp/t178kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated | 216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 381Nm/t255lb-ft/ton Calculated | 332Nm/t222lb-ft/ton Calculated | 300Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated | 246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 505km314mi Calculated | 505km314mi Calculated | 505km314mi Calculated | 505km314mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,490mm177in | 4,490mm177in | 4,490mm177in | 4,490mm177in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,770mm70in | 1,770mm70in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,450mm57in | 1,450mm57in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,625mm103in | 2,625mm103in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,515mm60in | 1,515mm60in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,515mm60in | 1,515mm60in | 1,515mm60in | 1,515mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | 140mm6in | 140mm6in | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 430L | 430L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 258g/km | 258g/km | 258g/km | 258g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 397 hp: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 2) 344 hp: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 1) 313 hp: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 265 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.2 s | 5.5 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.6 s | 14.2 s | 16.0 s | 20.0 s |
| Top speed | 287 km/h 178 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | 267 km/h 166 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.0 s | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.8 s | 9.0 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 11.1 s | 11.4 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 13.0 s | 13.4 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 199 km/h 124 mph | 191 km/h 119 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp | 397 hp 296 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp | 344 hp 257 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp | 313 hp 233 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp | 265 hp 198 kW |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 397 hp has 132 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 265 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 265 hp and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 397 hp: 132 hp (99 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp | 479 Nm 353 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp | 433 Nm 319 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp | 355 Nm 262 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp | 287 km/h 178 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp | 4.7 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp | 5.2 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp | 5.5 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 397 hp and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 265 hp: 1.4 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 2) 344 hp and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 1) 313 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp | 505 km 314 mi |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp | 505 km 314 mi |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp | 505 km 314 mi |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp | 505 km 314 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp | 397 hp 296 kW | 4.7 s | 287 km/h 178 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp | 344 hp 257 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.5 s | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.1 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 397 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)397 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)344 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)313 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0265 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 397 hp 296 kW | 344 hp 257 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 479 Nm 353 lb-ft | 433 Nm 319 lb-ft | 355 Nm 262 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.2 s | 5.5 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 287 km/h 178 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 505 km 314 mi | 505 km 314 mi | 505 km 314 mi | 505 km 314 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 258 g/km | 258 g/km | 258 g/km | 258 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 397 hp | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 2) 344 hp | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 1) 313 hp | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 265 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 397 hp
- Has 53 hp more
- Has 71 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 2) 344 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























