Car comparison

Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32VvsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XJ (X350)

4.2 V8 32V

300 hp4196 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2003-2006
VS

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII

2.0

265 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2005

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V

  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    411 Nm
    303 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    186 hp/t
    139 kW/t
    5.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    780 km
    485 mi
  • Largest trunk
    470 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32VMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
300hp224kW
265hp198kW
Torque
411Nm303lb-ft
355Nm262lb-ft
Curb weight
1,615kg3,560lb
1,445kg3,186lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
1,885kg4,156lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
245 km/h
152 mph
To 99% top speed
67.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
54.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
6.1s
0-200 km/h
20.7s
Calculated
20.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
5.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb
Calculated
183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
780km485mi
Calculated
505km314mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,196cc256cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
5,090mm200in
4,490mm177in
Width
1,860mm73in
1,770mm70in
Height
1,448mm57in
1,450mm57in
Wheelbase
3,034mm119in
2,625mm103in
Front track
1,556mm61in
1,515mm60in
Rear track
1,546mm61in
1,515mm60in
Ground clearance-
140mm6in
Trunk volume
470L
430L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
55L
CO2 emissions-
258g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32VMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V6,000 rpm4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.06,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32VMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
5.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
6.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.7 s
20.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
245 km/h
152 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
168 km/h
104 mph
171 km/h
106 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
300 hp
224 kW
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
265 hp
198 kW

Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V has 35 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: 35 hp (26 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
411 Nm
303 lb-ft
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
355 Nm
262 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
1,445 kg
3,186 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
245 km/h
152 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V6.6 s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.06.1 s

Although Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
780 km
485 mi
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
505 km
314 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
300 hp
224 kW
6.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
265 hp
198 kW
6.1 s
245 km/h
152 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
5,090 mm
200.4 in
Height
1,448 mm
57.0 in
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
6.6 s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
6.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32VMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
265 hp
198 kW
Torque
411 Nm
303 lb-ft
355 Nm
262 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
245 km/h
152 mph
Lightness
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
1,445 kg
3,186 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
5,090 mm
200.4 in
Height
1,448 mm
57.0 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Range score
780 km
485 mi
505 km
314 mi
CO2 score
-
258 g/km
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32VMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km19.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi30.70 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year2,861 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V

  • Has 35 hp more
  • Has 56 Nm more
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 275 km (171 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 40 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0

  • Is 170 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.2 V8 32V
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32VvsJaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
2.0 T
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
4.2 V8 32V
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32VvsJaguarXJ Sovereign (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
4.2 V8 32V
R 4.0 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32VvsJaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V
2.0
2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
4.2 V8 32V
R 4.0 24V Sport
VS
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32VvsJaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport
2.0
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
4.2 V8 32V
3.0d V6
VS
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32VvsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
2.0
3.2 i V6 24V
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsAcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V
4.2 V8 32V
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32VvsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8
2.0
Ralliart 2.0
VS
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer IXRalliart 2.0
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster