Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
2.0 (Stage 3)
420 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2005
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 · Stage 3vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 · Stage 2vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 · Stage 1vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
2.0 (Stage 2)
364 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2005
VS
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
2.0 (Stage 1)
330 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2005
VS
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
2.0
280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2005
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 420 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed292 km/h181 mph
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Highest torque594 Nm438 lb-ft
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight318 hp/t237 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range505 km314 mi
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW+140 hp | 364hp271kW+84 hp | 330hp246kW+50 hp | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 594Nm438lb-ft+211 Nm | 517Nm381lb-ft+134 Nm | 467Nm345lb-ft+84 Nm | 383Nm282lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 42.4s99% target: 289 km/h / 180 mph-12.2 s Calculated | 48.7s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph-6.0 s Calculated | 49.8s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph-4.9 s Calculated | 54.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s-1.3 s | 5.0s-0.9 s | 5.3s-0.6 s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.7s-5.9 s Calculated | 13.2s-4.4 s Calculated | 14.9s-2.8 s Calculated | 17.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s-1.2 s Calculated | 4.8s-0.8 s Calculated | 5.1s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s-1.6 s Calculated | 12.7s-1.1 s Calculated | 13.2s-0.7 s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 318hp/t237kW/t144hp/1000 lb Calculated | 276hp/t206kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated | 250hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated | 212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 450Nm/t301lb-ft/ton Calculated | 392Nm/t262lb-ft/ton Calculated | 354Nm/t237lb-ft/ton Calculated | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 505km314mi Calculated | 505km314mi Calculated | 505km314mi Calculated | 505km314mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,490mm177in | 4,490mm177in | 4,490mm177in | 4,490mm177in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,770mm70in | 1,770mm70in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,450mm57in | 1,450mm57in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,625mm103in | 2,625mm103in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,515mm60in | 1,515mm60in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,515mm60in | 1,515mm60in | 1,515mm60in | 1,515mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | 140mm6in | 140mm6in | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 430L | 430L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 420 hpMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 2) 364 hpMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 1) 330 hpMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 280 hpPowerTorque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 420 hp: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 2) 364 hp: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 1) 330 hp: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 280 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.8 s | 5.1 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.7 s | 13.2 s | 14.9 s | 17.6 s |
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.6 s | 8.9 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.9 s | 11.2 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.7 s | 13.2 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 205 km/h 127 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp | 420 hp 313 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp | 364 hp 271 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp | 330 hp 246 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp | 280 hp 209 kW |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 420 hp has 140 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 280 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 280 hp and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 420 hp: 140 hp (104 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp | 594 Nm 438 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp | 517 Nm 381 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp | 467 Nm 345 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp | 4.6 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp | 5.0 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp | 5.3 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 420 hp and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 280 hp: 1.3 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 2) 364 hp and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 1) 330 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp | 318 hp/t 237 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp | 250 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp | 505 km 314 mi |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp | 505 km 314 mi |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp | 505 km 314 mi |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp | 505 km 314 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.6 s | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp | 364 hp 271 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.3 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 420 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp | 318 hp/t 237 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp | 250 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 3)420 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 2)364 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 (Stage 1)330 hp | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0280 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 364 hp 271 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 594 Nm 438 lb-ft | 517 Nm 381 lb-ft | 467 Nm 345 lb-ft | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 505 km 314 mi | 505 km 314 mi | 505 km 314 mi | 505 km 314 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 318 hp/t 237 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 250 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 420 hp | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 2) 364 hp | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 1) 330 hp | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 280 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 3) 420 hp
- Has 56 hp more
- Has 77 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 (Stage 2) 364 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected
Popular comparisons
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsVolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsAcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsVolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsBMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsBMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d