Car comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0vsBMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII

2.0

280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2005
VS

BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90)

335d

286 hp2993 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2006-2007

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d

  • Most powerful
    286 hp
    213 kW
  • Highest torque
    580 Nm
    428 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    813 km
    505 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    67/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    73/100

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,320 kg
    2,910 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    212 hp/t
    158 kW/t
    4.7 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d
Power
280hp209kW
286hp213kW
Torque
383Nm282lb-ft
580Nm428lb-ft
Curb weight
1,320kg2,910lb
1,580kg3,483lb
Gross weight-
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
54.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
61.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.2s
0-200 km/h
17.6s
Calculated
19.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
5.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb
Calculated
181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton
Calculated
367Nm/t246lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
505km314mi
Calculated
813km505mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,490mm177in
4,520mm178in
Width
1,770mm70in
1,817mm72in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,421mm56in
Wheelbase
2,625mm103in
2,760mm109in
Front track
1,515mm60in
1,500mm59in
Rear track
1,515mm60in
1,513mm60in
Ground clearance
140mm6in
144mm6in
Trunk volume
430L
450L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
61L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335dPowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
  • BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.06,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm
BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d4,400 rpm1,750-2,250 rpm4,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
5.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.6 s
19.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
177 km/h
110 mph
172 km/h
107 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
280 hp
209 kW
BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d
286 hp
213 kW

BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d has 6 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
383 Nm
282 lb-ft
BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d
580 Nm
428 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
1,320 kg
2,910 lb
BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d
1,580 kg
3,483 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: 3.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
212 hp/t
158 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
505 km
314 mi
BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d
813 km
505 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
280 hp
209 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d
286 hp
213 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,520 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,421 mm
55.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
5.9 s
BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0
212 hp/t
158 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d
Power
280 hp
209 kW
286 hp
213 kW
Torque
383 Nm
282 lb-ft
580 Nm
428 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,320 kg
2,910 lb
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
Fuel consumption
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,490 mm
176.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,520 mm
178.0 in
Height
1,421 mm
55.9 in
Range score
505 km
314 mi
813 km
505 mi
Trunk score
430 L
15.2 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
212 hp/t
158 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d
Consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.08 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.70 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,861 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0

  • Is 260 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 197 Nm more
  • Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 309 km (192 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 20 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 vs BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d - car comparison - FastVsFaster