Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0vsBMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 3 Series Sedan (E90)
335d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range813 km505 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight212 hp/t158 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 383Nm282lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 61.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.6s Calculated | 19.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 367Nm/t246lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 505km314mi Calculated | 813km505mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,490mm177in | 4,520mm178in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,817mm72in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,421mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,760mm109in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,515mm60in | 1,513mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 450L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
- BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d | 4,400 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.6 s | 19.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d | 286 hp 213 kW |
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d has 6 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 5.9 s |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d | 6.2 s |
Although BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 505 km 314 mi |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d | 813 km 505 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | BMW3 Series Sedan (E90)335d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 505 km 314 mi | 813 km 505 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 | BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Is 260 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E90) 335d
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 197 Nm more
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 309 km (192 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























