Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

JCW 2.0

231 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    234 km/h
    145 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,555 kg
    3,428 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    158 g/km
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Best estimated range
    779 km
    484 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
231hp172kW
250hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,555kg3,428lb
1,902kg4,193lb
Gross weight
2,150kg4,740lb
2,430kg5,357lb
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.4s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
80.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
26.8s
Calculated
30.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
739km459mi
Calculated
779km484mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,565mm62in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,567mm62in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance-
216mm9in
Trunk volume
450L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
60L
CO2 emissions
158g/km
178g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5PowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.05,000-6,000 rpm1,450-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.8 s
30.6 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
231 hp
172 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 has 19 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 19 hp (14 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
1,555 kg
3,428 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
1,902 kg
4,193 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
234 km/h
145 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.06.5 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T56.8 s

Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 has more power, Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
739 km
459 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
779 km
484 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
231 hp
172 kW
6.5 s
234 km/h
145 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.5 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
231 hp
172 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.8 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
1,555 kg
3,428 lb
1,902 kg
4,193 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
739 km
459 mi
779 km
484 mi
CO2 score
158 g/km
178 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0

  • Is 347 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 20 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 19 hp more
  • Has 40 km (25 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 55 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

JCW 2.0
JCW 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014JCW 1.6
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
JCW 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
JCW 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0 T5
2.0t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
JCW 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 T5
2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
JCW 2.0
25d
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsBMWX2 (F39)25d
2.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
JCW 2.0
25i
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsBMWX1 (F48)25i
2.0 T5
2.0 P250
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster