Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5vsVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Volkswagen Tiguan II

2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,720 kg
    3,792 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    140 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    167 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    938 km
    583 mi
  • Largest trunk
    615 L
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
250hp186kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,902kg4,193lb
1,720kg3,792lb
Gross weight
2,430kg5,357lb
2,350kg5,181lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
228 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
68.0s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
30.6s
Calculated
28.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
779km484mi
Calculated
938km583mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,486mm177in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,839mm72in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,673mm66in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,677mm105in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,586mm62in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,576mm62in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
200mm8in
Trunk volume
505L
615L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
1,655L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L
CO2 emissions
178g/km
167g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIPowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.6 s
28.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
228 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
1,902 kg
4,193 lb
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
1,720 kg
3,792 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
228 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T56.8 s
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI6.5 s

Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
779 km
484 mi
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
938 km
583 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
6.5 s
228 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.8 s
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
250 hp
186 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
1,902 kg
4,193 lb
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Range score
779 km
484 mi
938 km
583 mi
CO2 score
178 g/km
167 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 182 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 158 km (98 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 110 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 11 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 T5
2.0t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0 T5
2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
2.0 T5
2.0 P250
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
2.0 BiTDI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TDI
2.0 T5
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 vs Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster