Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5vsJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P250

250 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250

  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,832 kg
    4,039 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    174 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    890 km
    553 mi
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.3 L/100 km
    25.3 mpg US
    30.4 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Power
250hp186kW
250hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,902kg4,193lb
1,832kg4,039lb
Gross weight
2,430kg5,357lb
2,400kg5,291lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
80.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
85.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
30.6s
Calculated
32.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
779km484mi
Calculated
890km553mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,984mm78in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,649mm65in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,681mm106in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,635mm64in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,634mm64in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
204mm8in
Trunk volume
505L
1,234L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
2,577L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
69L
CO2 emissions
178g/km
174g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2505,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.6 s
32.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
1,902 kg
4,193 lb
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
1,832 kg
4,039 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T56.8 s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2507.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
779 km
484 mi
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
890 km
553 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
7.0 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.8 s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,902 kg
4,193 lb
1,832 kg
4,039 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Range score
779 km
484 mi
890 km
553 mi
CO2 score
178 g/km
174 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250

  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 70 kg lighter
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 110 km (69 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 729 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 4 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2.0 P250
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0 P250
25t
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0 P250
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 P250
2.0 T5
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0 T5
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
2.0 P250
2.0
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0 T5
Sport 2.0 T
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
2.0 T5
GLS 350d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 - car comparison - FastVsFaster