Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250vsPorsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P250

250 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018

2.0

245 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    174 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    890 km
    553 mi
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
250hp186kW
245hp183kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
370Nm273lb-ft
Curb weight
1,832kg4,039lb
1,795kg3,957lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,510kg5,534lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
85.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
78.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
32.2s
Calculated
32.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
890km553mi
Calculated
802km499mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,696mm185in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,624mm64in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,807mm111in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,655mm65in
Rear track
1,634mm64in
1,651mm65in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
205mm8in
Trunk volume
1,234L
500L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
1,500L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
65L
CO2 emissions
174g/km
185g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0PowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2505,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.05,000-6,750 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm7,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.2 s
32.3 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 has 5 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
370 Nm
273 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
1,832 kg
4,039 lb
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
1,795 kg
3,957 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
230 km/h
143 mph
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P2507.0 s
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.06.7 s

Although Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 has more power, Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
890 km
553 mi
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
802 km
499 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
7.0 s
230 km/h
143 mph
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
245 hp
183 kW
6.7 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.0 s
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
245 hp
183 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
6.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,832 kg
4,039 lb
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,696 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Range score
890 km
553 mi
802 km
499 mi
CO2 score
174 g/km
185 g/km
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 87 km (54 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 734 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 11 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Porsche Macan I (95B) Facelift 2018 2.0

  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Is 37 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 P250
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 P250
25t
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
2.0 P250
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0
3.0 diesel V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6
2.0 P250
2.0 T5
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0
45 TFSI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI
2.0 P250
2.0 T5
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0
2.0 BiTDI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 P250
30d
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250vsBMWX7 (G07)30d
2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 vs Porsche Macan I (95B) · Facelift 2018 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster