Jaguar E-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250vsBMW X7 (G07) 30d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X7 (G07)
30d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Lightest1,832 kg4,039 lb
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions174 g/km
- Largest trunk1,234 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best practicality score91/100
BMW X7 (G07) 30d
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,176 km731 mi
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | BMWX7 (G07)30d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,832kg4,039lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 3,220kg7,099lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 97.2s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.2s Calculated | 36.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 890km553mi Calculated | 1,176km731mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 5,151mm203in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,649mm65in | 1,805mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 3,105mm122in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,684mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,634mm64in | 1,705mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 1,234L | 326L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,577L | 2,120L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 69L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 174g/km | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
- BMW X7 (G07) 30d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 4,000 rpm | 2,000-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | BMWX7 (G07)30d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.2 s | 36.5 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 265 hp 198 kW |
BMW X7 (G07) 30d has 15 hp more than Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 and BMW X7 (G07) 30d: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 1,832 kg 4,039 lb |
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 7.0 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 7.0 s |
Although BMW X7 (G07) 30d has more power, Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X7 (G07) 30d and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 890 km 553 mi |
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 1,176 km 731 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.0 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 265 hp 198 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)30d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)30d |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X7 (G07) 30d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)30d | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | BMWX7 (G07)30d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,832 kg 4,039 lb | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 890 km 553 mi | 1,176 km 731 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 174 g/km | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,234 L 43.6 cu ft | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 | BMW X7 (G07) 30d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
- Is 538 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 908 L more trunk volume
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW X7 (G07) 30d
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 255 Nm more
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 287 km (178 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























