Volvo XC40
Car comparison
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions164 g/km
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score87/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Best estimated range779 km484 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 247hp184kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,902kg4,193lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | 2,430kg5,357lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 80.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.7s Calculated | 30.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | 779km484mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,863mm73in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,702mm106in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 211mm8in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,336L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | 178g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.7 s | 30.6 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 has 3 hp more than Volvo XC40 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 1,902 kg 4,193 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 6.5 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 6.8 s |
Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 has more power, Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 750 km 466 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 779 km 484 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 247 hp 184 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 1,902 kg 4,193 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | 779 km 484 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | 178 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Is 222 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 14 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























