Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5vsPorsche Macan I (95B) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Porsche Macan I (95B)

2.0

252 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Most powerful
    252 hp
    188 kW
  • Highest torque
    370 Nm
    273 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,770 kg
    3,902 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    142 hp/t
    106 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    172 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    878 km
    546 mi
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
250hp186kW
252hp188kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
370Nm273lb-ft
Curb weight
1,902kg4,193lb
1,770kg3,902lb
Gross weight
2,430kg5,357lb
2,445kg5,390lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
229 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
80.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
80.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
30.6s
Calculated
30.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
779km484mi
Calculated
878km546mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,697mm185in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,624mm64in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,807mm111in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,655mm65in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,651mm65in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
185mm7in
Trunk volume
505L
500L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
1,500L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
65L
CO2 emissions
178g/km
172g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.05,000-6,800 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.6 s
30.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
229 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
252 hp
188 kW

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 has 2 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
370 Nm
273 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
1,902 kg
4,193 lb
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
1,770 kg
3,902 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
229 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T56.8 s
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.06.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
779 km
484 mi
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
878 km
546 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
252 hp
188 kW
6.7 s
229 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.8 s
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
252 hp
188 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
229 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
1,902 kg
4,193 lb
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Range score
779 km
484 mi
878 km
546 mi
CO2 score
178 g/km
172 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km12.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi20.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,943 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 132 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 99 km (62 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 6 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
2.0 T5
2.0t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
2.0
3.0 diesel V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6
2.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
2.0 T5
2.0 P250
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
2.0 T5
S 3.0 Diesel V6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6
2.0
2.0 T5
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0 T5
Sport 2.0 T
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 vs Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster