BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 25dvsMini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (F60)
JCW 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range962 km598 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Lightest1,555 kg3,428 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)25d | MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,555kg3,428lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.7s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 72.2s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 26.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 962km598mi Calculated | 739km459mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,567mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,390L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 158g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 25d: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,450-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)25d | MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 26.8 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 6.7 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 and BMW X2 (F39) 25d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 962 km 598 mi |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 739 km 459 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.5 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)25d | MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 962 km 598 mi | 739 km 459 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 158 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 25d | Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 223 km (139 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























