BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 25dvsBMW X3 (F25) 28i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X3 (F25)
28i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,585 kg3,494 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range962 km598 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
BMW X3 (F25) 28i
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)25d | BMWX3 (F25)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,310kg5,093lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.7s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 30.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 962km598mi Calculated | 893km555mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,648mm183in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,661mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,632mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 67L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 175g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 25d: Power / Torque
- BMW X3 (F25) 28i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 5,000 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)25d | BMWX3 (F25)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 30.0 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 245 hp 183 kW |
BMW X3 (F25) 28i has 14 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 25d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and BMW X3 (F25) 28i: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 6.7 s |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 6.7 s |
Although BMW X3 (F25) 28i has more power, BMW X2 (F39) 25d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and BMW X3 (F25) 28i: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 962 km 598 mi |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 893 km 555 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX3 (F25)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX3 (F25)28i |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX3 (F25)28i | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)25d | BMWX3 (F25)28i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 962 km 598 mi | 893 km 555 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 175 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 25d | BMW X3 (F25) 28i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 69 km (43 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW X3 (F25) 28i
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























