BMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012 28ivsBMW X2 (F39) 25d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X2 (F39)
25d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,585 kg3,494 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range962 km598 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score82/100
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 70.7s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.5s Calculated | 25.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 863km536mi Calculated | 962km598mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,477mm176in | 4,360mm172in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,824mm72in |
| Height | 1,545mm61in | 1,526mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,529mm60in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 182mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,350L | 1,355L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 171g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i: Power / Torque
- BMW X2 (F39) 25d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.5 s | 25.9 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 245 hp 183 kW |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW |
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i has 14 hp more than BMW X2 (F39) 25d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 6.4 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i and BMW X2 (F39) 25d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 25d and BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 863 km 536 mi |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 962 km 598 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.4 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX2 (F39)25d |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| BMWX2 (F39)25d | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i | BMWX2 (F39)25d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 863 km 536 mi | 962 km 598 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 171 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i | BMW X2 (F39) 25d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW X2 (F39) 25d
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 99 km (62 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























