Mazda CX-80
Car comparison
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-60
3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Most powerful284 hp212 kW
- Lightest1,949 kg4,297 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk477 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted219 km/h136 mph Restricted
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,276 km793 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 284hp212kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,136kg4,709lb | 1,949kg4,297lb |
| Gross weight | 2,781kg6,131lb | 2,500kg5,512lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph Calculated | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 99.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.9s Calculated | 34.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,276km793mi Calculated | 784km487mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,283cc200cu in | 3,283cc200cu in |
| Length | 4,995mm197in | 4,745mm187in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,890mm74in |
| Height | 1,710mm67in | 1,688mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 3,120mm123in | 2,870mm113in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,645mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 170mm7in | 179mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 258L | 477L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,971L | 1,726L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 171g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 3,750 rpm | 1,500-2,400 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 2,000-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.9 s | 34.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph Limited | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 254 hp 189 kW |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 284 hp 212 kW |
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G has 30 hp more than Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 2,136 kg 4,709 lb |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 1,949 kg 4,297 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 8.4 s |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,276 km 793 mi |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 784 km 487 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 254 hp 189 kW | 8.4 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 284 hp 212 kW | 6.9 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 284 hp 212 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,136 kg 4,709 lb | 1,949 kg 4,297 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,276 km 793 mi | 784 km 487 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 171 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 258 L 9.1 cu ft | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D | Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 492 km (306 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
- Has 30 hp more
- Is 187 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 219 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























