Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350dvsMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167)

GLS 350d

286 hp2925 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2019-2023
VS

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv G

284 hp3283 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Lightest
    1,949 kg
    4,297 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.8 L/100 km
    24.0 mpg US
    28.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    477 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d

  • Fastest top speed
    227 km/h
    141 mph
  • Most powerful
    286 hp
    213 kW
  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    1,111 km
    690 mi
  • Best performance score
    58/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350dMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
286hp213kW
284hp212kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
2,425kg5,346lb
1,949kg4,297lb
Gross weight
3,250kg7,165lb
2,500kg5,512lb
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
To 99% top speed
96.0s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
72.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
36.2s
Calculated
34.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
247Nm/t166lb-ft/ton
Calculated
231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,111km690mi
Calculated
784km487mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,925cc178cu in
3,283cc200cu in
Length
5,207mm205in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,956mm77in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,838mm72in
1,688mm66in
Wheelbase
3,135mm123in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,669mm66in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,692mm67in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance
215mm8in
179mm7in
Trunk volume
355L
477L
Max trunk volume
2,400L
1,726L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
90L
58L
CO2 emissions-
171g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350dMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv GPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d3,400-4,600 rpm1,200-3,200 rpm4,850 rpm
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G5,000-6,000 rpm2,000-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350dMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.2 s
34.7 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
92 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
286 hp
213 kW
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
284 hp
212 kW

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d has 2 hp more than Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
2,425 kg
5,346 lb
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
1,949 kg
4,297 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
227 km/h
141 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
219 km/h
136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d7.0 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G6.9 s

Although Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d has more power, Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
1,111 km
690 mi
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
784 km
487 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
286 hp
213 kW
7.0 s
227 km/h
141 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
284 hp
212 kW
6.9 s
219 km/h
136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
355 L
12.5 cu ft
Length
5,207 mm
205.0 in
Height
1,838 mm
72.4 in
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,688 mm
66.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
284 hp
212 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.0 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350dMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv G
Power
286 hp
213 kW
284 hp
212 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
6.9 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Lightness
2,425 kg
5,346 lb
1,949 kg
4,297 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
355 L
12.5 cu ft
Length
5,207 mm
205.0 in
Height
1,838 mm
72.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,688 mm
66.5 in
Range score
1,111 km
690 mi
784 km
487 mi
CO2 score
-
171 g/km
Trunk score
355 L
12.5 cu ft
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350dMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km12.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi20.84 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year1,943 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 327 km (203 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G

  • Is 476 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 122 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 350d vs Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv G - car comparison - FastVsFaster